New report: Texas’ uninsured population remains predominantly Hispanic, middle-aged, under-educated and poor

Texas’ uninsured population remains primarily Hispanic, middle-aged, with low incomes and without a college degree, according to a new report released today by the Episcopal Health Foundation and Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy.


The report compared the characteristics of the uninsured population before the opening of the Affordable Care Act Marketplace in September 2013 and at the end of the second ACA enrollment period in March 2015. While the overall percentage of uninsured fell from 24.6 percent to 16.9 percent, the characteristics of the uninsured population showed little change. The uninsured population remains primarily middle-aged (between ages 31-49), Hispanic, low income (at or below 138 percent of the federal poverty level), and without a college education. 

 “Not surprisingly, the lowest-income adults comprise an increasingly large percentage of the uninsured, because most of them were ineligible for coverage opportunities in the Marketplace,” said Elena Marks, president and CEO of the Episcopal Health Foundation and a nonresident health policy fellow at the Baker Institute. “The ACA offered coverage to this group through optional Medicaid expansion, but Texas has not expanded Medicaid.”

 While the majority of the remaining uninsured adults are Hispanic, the report found the rate of uninsured for Texas Hispanics actually went down 38 percent since ACA Marketplace enrollment began. That was the largest percentage reduction of any group in the statewide survey.

 The report also compared the self-reported health status of uninsured adult Texans before and after enrollment in the ACA. The report found the percentage of uninsured who said they were in very good health declined significantly (30 percent to 17 percent). In addition, the percentage of uninsured reporting themselves in good health rose (39 percent to 50 percent). Researchers say these changes suggest that those who were able to gain coverage since 2013 are healthier on average than those who remain uninsured.

 “These results are consistent with research studies showing a strong correlation between income and health status,” said Vivian Ho, the chair in health economics at Rice’s Baker Institute and director of the institute’s Center for Health and Biosciences, a profession of economics at Rice and a professor of medicine at Baylor College of Medicine. “The lowest income families, who are likely to have worse health status, have no access to subsidies. The ACA intended to give the poorest individuals Medicaid coverage, but Texas has not elected the Medicaid expansion offered by the law.”

 The report found cost of health insurance continues to be the primary reason the uninsured don’t have coverage. While 57 percent cited cost as the main reason for not being covered, 47 percent said the possibility of a tax penalty was “not too important” or “not at all important” a factor in obtaining coverage. A small, but not insignificant, percentage of uninsured participants (17.3 percent) reported they did not want health insurance.

 The report is the 13th in a series on the implementation of the ACA in Texas co-authored by Marks and Ho.

 The Health Reform Monitoring Survey (HRMS) is a quarterly survey of adults ages 18-64 that began in 2013. This issue brief is a summary of data extracted from the HRMS surveys in Texas administered in September 2013 and March 2015 with responses from over 1,500 Texans.

 It is designed to provide timely information on implementation issues under the ACA and to document changes in health insurance coverage and related health outcomes. Rice University’s Baker Institute and the Episcopal Health Foundation are partnering to fund and report on key factors about Texans obtained from an expanded, representative sample of Texas residents (HRMS-Texas).

 The HRMS was developed by the Urban Institute, conducted by GfK, and jointly funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the Ford Foundation and the Urban Institute. The analyses and conclusions based on HRMS-Texas are those of the authors and do not represent the view of the Urban Institute, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation or the Ford Foundation.

See full survey report here